nand erase: .spread, .part, .chip subcommands
A while back, in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054428.html,
Michele De Candia posted a patch to not count bad blocks toward the
requested size to be erased. This is desireable when you're passing in
something like $filesize, but not when you're trying to erase a partition.
Thus, a .spread subcommand (named for consistency with
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075163.html) is introduced
to make explicit the user's desire to erase for a given amount of data,
rather than to erase a specific region of the chip.
While passing $filesize to "nand erase" is useful, accidentally passing
something like $fliesize currently produces quite unpleasant results, as the
variable evaluates to nothing and U-Boot assumes that you want to erase
the entire rest of the chip/partition. To improve the safety of the
erase command, require the user to make explicit their intentions by
using a .part or .chip subcommand. This is an incompatible user interface
change, but keeping compatibility would eliminate the safety gain, and IMHO
it's worth it.
While touching nand_erase_opts(), make it accept 64-bit offsets and sizes,
fix the percentage display when erase length is rounded up, eliminate
an inconsistent warning about rounding up the erase length which only
happened when the length was less than one block (rounding up for $filesize
is normal operation), and add a diagnostic if there's an attempt to erase
beginning at a non-block boundary.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
index 0f67790..6a5dd37 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
{
struct jffs2_unknown_node cleanmarker;
erase_info_t erase;
- ulong erase_length;
+ unsigned long erase_length, erased_length; /* in blocks */
int bbtest = 1;
int result;
int percent_complete = -1;
@@ -84,13 +84,19 @@
struct mtd_oob_ops oob_opts;
struct nand_chip *chip = meminfo->priv;
+ if ((opts->offset & (meminfo->writesize - 1)) != 0) {
+ printf("Attempt to erase non page aligned data\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
memset(&erase, 0, sizeof(erase));
memset(&oob_opts, 0, sizeof(oob_opts));
erase.mtd = meminfo;
erase.len = meminfo->erasesize;
erase.addr = opts->offset;
- erase_length = opts->length;
+ erase_length = lldiv(opts->length + meminfo->erasesize - 1,
+ meminfo->erasesize);
cleanmarker.magic = cpu_to_je16 (JFFS2_MAGIC_BITMASK);
cleanmarker.nodetype = cpu_to_je16 (JFFS2_NODETYPE_CLEANMARKER);
@@ -114,15 +120,8 @@
priv_nand->bbt = NULL;
}
- if (erase_length < meminfo->erasesize) {
- printf("Warning: Erase size 0x%08lx smaller than one " \
- "erase block 0x%08x\n",erase_length, meminfo->erasesize);
- printf(" Erasing 0x%08x instead\n", meminfo->erasesize);
- erase_length = meminfo->erasesize;
- }
-
- for (;
- erase.addr < opts->offset + erase_length;
+ for (erased_length = 0;
+ erased_length < erase_length;
erase.addr += meminfo->erasesize) {
WATCHDOG_RESET ();
@@ -135,6 +134,10 @@
"0x%08llx "
" \n",
erase.addr);
+
+ if (!opts->spread)
+ erased_length++;
+
continue;
} else if (ret < 0) {
@@ -145,6 +148,8 @@
}
}
+ erased_length++;
+
result = meminfo->erase(meminfo, &erase);
if (result != 0) {
printf("\n%s: MTD Erase failure: %d\n",
@@ -171,9 +176,7 @@
}
if (!opts->quiet) {
- unsigned long long n =(unsigned long long)
- (erase.addr + meminfo->erasesize - opts->offset)
- * 100;
+ unsigned long long n = erased_length * 100ULL;
int percent;
do_div(n, erase_length);