clk: k210: Fix checking if ulongs are less than 0
The PLL functions take ulong arguments for rate, but still check if that
rate is negative (which is never true). The correct way to handle this is
to use IS_ERR_VALUE (like is already done in k210_clk_set_rate). While
we're at it, we can move the error checking up into the caller of the pll
set/get rate functions. This also protects our other calculations from
using bogus values for rate.
Fixes: 609bd60b94 ("clk: k210: Rewrite to remove CCF")
Reported-by: Coverity Scan <scan-admin@coverity.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_kendryte.c b/drivers/clk/clk_kendryte.c
index 3148756..2caa21a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_kendryte.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_kendryte.c
@@ -849,9 +849,6 @@
u32 reg;
ulong calc_rate;
- if (rate_in < 0)
- return rate_in;
-
err = k210_pll_calc_config(rate, rate_in, &config);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -895,7 +892,7 @@
u64 r, f, od;
u32 reg = readl(priv->base + k210_plls[id].off);
- if (rate_in < 0 || (reg & K210_PLL_BYPASS))
+ if (reg & K210_PLL_BYPASS)
return rate_in;
if (!(reg & K210_PLL_PWRD))
@@ -1029,6 +1026,8 @@
parent = k210_clk_get_parent(priv, id);
parent_rate = do_k210_clk_get_rate(priv, parent);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(parent_rate))
+ return parent_rate;
if (k210_clks[id].flags & K210_CLKF_PLL)
return k210_pll_get_rate(priv, k210_clks[id].pll, parent_rate);
@@ -1099,6 +1098,8 @@
parent = k210_clk_get_parent(priv, clk->id);
rate_in = do_k210_clk_get_rate(priv, parent);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(rate_in))
+ return rate_in;
log_debug("id=%ld rate=%lu rate_in=%lu\n", clk->id, rate, rate_in);