sandbox: Correct ordering of 'sb save' commands
Prior to commit d455d87 there was an inconsistency between the position of
the 'address' parameter in 'sb load' and 'sb save'. This was corrected but
it broke some tests. Fix the tests and also the help for 'sb save'.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
diff --git a/common/cmd_sandbox.c b/common/cmd_sandbox.c
index 3d9fce7..4286969 100644
--- a/common/cmd_sandbox.c
+++ b/common/cmd_sandbox.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
"load hostfs - <addr> <filename> [<bytes> <offset>] - "
"load a file from host\n"
"sb ls hostfs - <filename> - list files on host\n"
- "sb save hostfs - <filename> <addr> <bytes> [<offset>] - "
+ "sb save hostfs - <addr> <filename> <bytes> [<offset>] - "
"save a file to host\n"
"sb bind <dev> [<filename>] - bind \"host\" device to file\n"
"sb info [<dev>] - show device binding & info\n"
diff --git a/test/dm/sf.c b/test/dm/sf.c
index 57dd134..08098a1 100644
--- a/test/dm/sf.c
+++ b/test/dm/sf.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* benefit is worth the extra complexity.
*/
ut_asserteq(0, run_command_list(
- "sb save hostfs - spi.bin 0 200000;"
+ "sb save hostfs - 0 spi.bin 200000;"
"sf probe;"
"sf test 0 10000", -1, 0));
/*
diff --git a/test/image/test-fit.py b/test/image/test-fit.py
index b065fcb..0eb424d 100755
--- a/test/image/test-fit.py
+++ b/test/image/test-fit.py
@@ -97,9 +97,9 @@
fdt addr %(fit_addr)x
bootm start %(fit_addr)x
bootm loados
-sb save hostfs 0 %(kernel_out)s %(kernel_addr)x %(kernel_size)x
-sb save hostfs 0 %(fdt_out)s %(fdt_addr)x %(fdt_size)x
-sb save hostfs 0 %(ramdisk_out)s %(ramdisk_addr)x %(ramdisk_size)x
+sb save hostfs 0 %(kernel_addr)x %(kernel_out)s %(kernel_size)x
+sb save hostfs 0 %(fdt_addr)x %(fdt_out)s %(fdt_size)x
+sb save hostfs 0 %(ramdisk_addr)x %(ramdisk_out)s %(ramdisk_size)x
reset
'''