treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:
It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.
Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.
Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:
void foo(bd_t *bd);
This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.
To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>
#include <asm/u-boot.h>
void foo(bd_t *bd);
Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.
If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:
struct bd_info;
void foo(struct bd_info *bd);
Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.
I used coccinelle to generate this commit.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
<smpl>
@@
typedef bd_t;
@@
-bd_t
+struct bd_info
</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
diff --git a/post/drivers/memory.c b/post/drivers/memory.c
index 9cc48b1..e90ada3 100644
--- a/post/drivers/memory.c
+++ b/post/drivers/memory.c
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@
__attribute__((weak))
int arch_memory_test_prepare(u32 *vstart, u32 *size, phys_addr_t *phys_offset)
{
- bd_t *bd = gd->bd;
+ struct bd_info *bd = gd->bd;
*vstart = CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE;
*size = (gd->ram_size >= 256 << 20 ?