| Driver Model |
| ============ |
| |
| This README contains high-level information about driver model, a unified |
| way of declaring and accessing drivers in U-Boot. The original work was done |
| by: |
| |
| Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> |
| Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis@gmail.com> |
| Viktor Křivák <viktor.krivak@gmail.com> |
| Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@gmail.com> |
| |
| This has been both simplified and extended into the current implementation |
| by: |
| |
| Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
| |
| |
| Terminology |
| ----------- |
| |
| Uclass - a group of devices which operate in the same way. A uclass provides |
| a way of accessing individual devices within the group, but always |
| using the same interface. For example a GPIO uclass provides |
| operations for get/set value. An I2C uclass may have 10 I2C ports, |
| 4 with one driver, and 6 with another. |
| |
| Driver - some code which talks to a peripheral and presents a higher-level |
| interface to it. |
| |
| Device - an instance of a driver, tied to a particular port or peripheral. |
| |
| |
| How to try it |
| ------------- |
| |
| Build U-Boot sandbox and run it: |
| |
| make sandbox_config |
| make |
| ./u-boot |
| |
| (type 'reset' to exit U-Boot) |
| |
| |
| There is a uclass called 'demo'. This uclass handles |
| saying hello, and reporting its status. There are two drivers in this |
| uclass: |
| |
| - simple: Just prints a message for hello, doesn't implement status |
| - shape: Prints shapes and reports number of characters printed as status |
| |
| The demo class is pretty simple, but not trivial. The intention is that it |
| can be used for testing, so it will implement all driver model features and |
| provide good code coverage of them. It does have multiple drivers, it |
| handles parameter data and platdata (data which tells the driver how |
| to operate on a particular platform) and it uses private driver data. |
| |
| To try it, see the example session below: |
| |
| =>demo hello 1 |
| Hello '@' from 07981110: red 4 |
| =>demo status 2 |
| Status: 0 |
| =>demo hello 2 |
| g |
| r@ |
| e@@ |
| e@@@ |
| n@@@@ |
| g@@@@@ |
| =>demo status 2 |
| Status: 21 |
| =>demo hello 4 ^ |
| y^^^ |
| e^^^^^ |
| l^^^^^^^ |
| l^^^^^^^ |
| o^^^^^ |
| w^^^ |
| =>demo status 4 |
| Status: 36 |
| => |
| |
| |
| Running the tests |
| ----------------- |
| |
| The intent with driver model is that the core portion has 100% test coverage |
| in sandbox, and every uclass has its own test. As a move towards this, tests |
| are provided in test/dm. To run them, try: |
| |
| ./test/dm/test-dm.sh |
| |
| You should see something like this: |
| |
| <...U-Boot banner...> |
| Running 22 driver model tests |
| Test: dm_test_autobind |
| Test: dm_test_autoprobe |
| Test: dm_test_bus_children |
| Device 'd-test': seq 3 is in use by 'b-test' |
| Device 'c-test@0': seq 0 is in use by 'a-test' |
| Device 'c-test@1': seq 1 is in use by 'd-test' |
| Test: dm_test_bus_children_funcs |
| Test: dm_test_bus_children_iterators |
| Test: dm_test_bus_parent_data |
| Test: dm_test_bus_parent_ops |
| Test: dm_test_children |
| Test: dm_test_fdt |
| Device 'd-test': seq 3 is in use by 'b-test' |
| Test: dm_test_fdt_offset |
| Test: dm_test_fdt_pre_reloc |
| Test: dm_test_fdt_uclass_seq |
| Device 'd-test': seq 3 is in use by 'b-test' |
| Device 'a-test': seq 0 is in use by 'd-test' |
| Test: dm_test_gpio |
| sandbox_gpio: sb_gpio_get_value: error: offset 4 not reserved |
| Test: dm_test_leak |
| Test: dm_test_lifecycle |
| Test: dm_test_operations |
| Test: dm_test_ordering |
| Test: dm_test_platdata |
| Test: dm_test_pre_reloc |
| Test: dm_test_remove |
| Test: dm_test_uclass |
| Test: dm_test_uclass_before_ready |
| Failures: 0 |
| |
| |
| What is going on? |
| ----------------- |
| |
| Let's start at the top. The demo command is in common/cmd_demo.c. It does |
| the usual command processing and then: |
| |
| struct udevice *demo_dev; |
| |
| ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_DEMO, devnum, &demo_dev); |
| |
| UCLASS_DEMO means the class of devices which implement 'demo'. Other |
| classes might be MMC, or GPIO, hashing or serial. The idea is that the |
| devices in the class all share a particular way of working. The class |
| presents a unified view of all these devices to U-Boot. |
| |
| This function looks up a device for the demo uclass. Given a device |
| number we can find the device because all devices have registered with |
| the UCLASS_DEMO uclass. |
| |
| The device is automatically activated ready for use by uclass_get_device(). |
| |
| Now that we have the device we can do things like: |
| |
| return demo_hello(demo_dev, ch); |
| |
| This function is in the demo uclass. It takes care of calling the 'hello' |
| method of the relevant driver. Bearing in mind that there are two drivers, |
| this particular device may use one or other of them. |
| |
| The code for demo_hello() is in drivers/demo/demo-uclass.c: |
| |
| int demo_hello(struct udevice *dev, int ch) |
| { |
| const struct demo_ops *ops = device_get_ops(dev); |
| |
| if (!ops->hello) |
| return -ENOSYS; |
| |
| return ops->hello(dev, ch); |
| } |
| |
| As you can see it just calls the relevant driver method. One of these is |
| in drivers/demo/demo-simple.c: |
| |
| static int simple_hello(struct udevice *dev, int ch) |
| { |
| const struct dm_demo_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev); |
| |
| printf("Hello from %08x: %s %d\n", map_to_sysmem(dev), |
| pdata->colour, pdata->sides); |
| |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| |
| So that is a trip from top (command execution) to bottom (driver action) |
| but it leaves a lot of topics to address. |
| |
| |
| Declaring Drivers |
| ----------------- |
| |
| A driver declaration looks something like this (see |
| drivers/demo/demo-shape.c): |
| |
| static const struct demo_ops shape_ops = { |
| .hello = shape_hello, |
| .status = shape_status, |
| }; |
| |
| U_BOOT_DRIVER(demo_shape_drv) = { |
| .name = "demo_shape_drv", |
| .id = UCLASS_DEMO, |
| .ops = &shape_ops, |
| .priv_data_size = sizeof(struct shape_data), |
| }; |
| |
| |
| This driver has two methods (hello and status) and requires a bit of |
| private data (accessible through dev_get_priv(dev) once the driver has |
| been probed). It is a member of UCLASS_DEMO so will register itself |
| there. |
| |
| In U_BOOT_DRIVER it is also possible to specify special methods for bind |
| and unbind, and these are called at appropriate times. For many drivers |
| it is hoped that only 'probe' and 'remove' will be needed. |
| |
| The U_BOOT_DRIVER macro creates a data structure accessible from C, |
| so driver model can find the drivers that are available. |
| |
| The methods a device can provide are documented in the device.h header. |
| Briefly, they are: |
| |
| bind - make the driver model aware of a device (bind it to its driver) |
| unbind - make the driver model forget the device |
| ofdata_to_platdata - convert device tree data to platdata - see later |
| probe - make a device ready for use |
| remove - remove a device so it cannot be used until probed again |
| |
| The sequence to get a device to work is bind, ofdata_to_platdata (if using |
| device tree) and probe. |
| |
| |
| Platform Data |
| ------------- |
| |
| Platform data is like Linux platform data, if you are familiar with that. |
| It provides the board-specific information to start up a device. |
| |
| Why is this information not just stored in the device driver itself? The |
| idea is that the device driver is generic, and can in principle operate on |
| any board that has that type of device. For example, with modern |
| highly-complex SoCs it is common for the IP to come from an IP vendor, and |
| therefore (for example) the MMC controller may be the same on chips from |
| different vendors. It makes no sense to write independent drivers for the |
| MMC controller on each vendor's SoC, when they are all almost the same. |
| Similarly, we may have 6 UARTs in an SoC, all of which are mostly the same, |
| but lie at different addresses in the address space. |
| |
| Using the UART example, we have a single driver and it is instantiated 6 |
| times by supplying 6 lots of platform data. Each lot of platform data |
| gives the driver name and a pointer to a structure containing information |
| about this instance - e.g. the address of the register space. It may be that |
| one of the UARTS supports RS-485 operation - this can be added as a flag in |
| the platform data, which is set for this one port and clear for the rest. |
| |
| Think of your driver as a generic piece of code which knows how to talk to |
| a device, but needs to know where it is, any variant/option information and |
| so on. Platform data provides this link between the generic piece of code |
| and the specific way it is bound on a particular board. |
| |
| Examples of platform data include: |
| |
| - The base address of the IP block's register space |
| - Configuration options, like: |
| - the SPI polarity and maximum speed for a SPI controller |
| - the I2C speed to use for an I2C device |
| - the number of GPIOs available in a GPIO device |
| |
| Where does the platform data come from? It is either held in a structure |
| which is compiled into U-Boot, or it can be parsed from the Device Tree |
| (see 'Device Tree' below). |
| |
| For an example of how it can be compiled in, see demo-pdata.c which |
| sets up a table of driver names and their associated platform data. |
| The data can be interpreted by the drivers however they like - it is |
| basically a communication scheme between the board-specific code and |
| the generic drivers, which are intended to work on any board. |
| |
| Drivers can access their data via dev->info->platdata. Here is |
| the declaration for the platform data, which would normally appear |
| in the board file. |
| |
| static const struct dm_demo_cdata red_square = { |
| .colour = "red", |
| .sides = 4. |
| }; |
| static const struct driver_info info[] = { |
| { |
| .name = "demo_shape_drv", |
| .platdata = &red_square, |
| }, |
| }; |
| |
| demo1 = driver_bind(root, &info[0]); |
| |
| |
| Device Tree |
| ----------- |
| |
| While platdata is useful, a more flexible way of providing device data is |
| by using device tree. With device tree we replace the above code with the |
| following device tree fragment: |
| |
| red-square { |
| compatible = "demo-shape"; |
| colour = "red"; |
| sides = <4>; |
| }; |
| |
| This means that instead of having lots of U_BOOT_DEVICE() declarations in |
| the board file, we put these in the device tree. This approach allows a lot |
| more generality, since the same board file can support many types of boards |
| (e,g. with the same SoC) just by using different device trees. An added |
| benefit is that the Linux device tree can be used, thus further simplifying |
| the task of board-bring up either for U-Boot or Linux devs (whoever gets to |
| the board first!). |
| |
| The easiest way to make this work it to add a few members to the driver: |
| |
| .platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct dm_test_pdata), |
| .ofdata_to_platdata = testfdt_ofdata_to_platdata, |
| |
| The 'auto_alloc' feature allowed space for the platdata to be allocated |
| and zeroed before the driver's ofdata_to_platdata() method is called. The |
| ofdata_to_platdata() method, which the driver write supplies, should parse |
| the device tree node for this device and place it in dev->platdata. Thus |
| when the probe method is called later (to set up the device ready for use) |
| the platform data will be present. |
| |
| Note that both methods are optional. If you provide an ofdata_to_platdata |
| method then it will be called first (during activation). If you provide a |
| probe method it will be called next. See Driver Lifecycle below for more |
| details. |
| |
| If you don't want to have the platdata automatically allocated then you |
| can leave out platdata_auto_alloc_size. In this case you can use malloc |
| in your ofdata_to_platdata (or probe) method to allocate the required memory, |
| and you should free it in the remove method. |
| |
| |
| Declaring Uclasses |
| ------------------ |
| |
| The demo uclass is declared like this: |
| |
| U_BOOT_CLASS(demo) = { |
| .id = UCLASS_DEMO, |
| }; |
| |
| It is also possible to specify special methods for probe, etc. The uclass |
| numbering comes from include/dm/uclass.h. To add a new uclass, add to the |
| end of the enum there, then declare your uclass as above. |
| |
| |
| Device Sequence Numbers |
| ----------------------- |
| |
| U-Boot numbers devices from 0 in many situations, such as in the command |
| line for I2C and SPI buses, and the device names for serial ports (serial0, |
| serial1, ...). Driver model supports this numbering and permits devices |
| to be locating by their 'sequence'. This numbering unique identifies a |
| device in its uclass, so no two devices within a particular uclass can have |
| the same sequence number. |
| |
| Sequence numbers start from 0 but gaps are permitted. For example, a board |
| may have I2C buses 0, 1, 4, 5 but no 2 or 3. The choice of how devices are |
| numbered is up to a particular board, and may be set by the SoC in some |
| cases. While it might be tempting to automatically renumber the devices |
| where there are gaps in the sequence, this can lead to confusion and is |
| not the way that U-Boot works. |
| |
| Each device can request a sequence number. If none is required then the |
| device will be automatically allocated the next available sequence number. |
| |
| To specify the sequence number in the device tree an alias is typically |
| used. |
| |
| aliases { |
| serial2 = "/serial@22230000"; |
| }; |
| |
| This indicates that in the uclass called "serial", the named node |
| ("/serial@22230000") will be given sequence number 2. Any command or driver |
| which requests serial device 2 will obtain this device. |
| |
| Some devices represent buses where the devices on the bus are numbered or |
| addressed. For example, SPI typically numbers its slaves from 0, and I2C |
| uses a 7-bit address. In these cases the 'reg' property of the subnode is |
| used, for example: |
| |
| { |
| aliases { |
| spi2 = "/spi@22300000"; |
| }; |
| |
| spi@22300000 { |
| #address-cells = <1>; |
| #size-cells = <1>; |
| spi-flash@0 { |
| reg = <0>; |
| ... |
| } |
| eeprom@1 { |
| reg = <1>; |
| }; |
| }; |
| |
| In this case we have a SPI bus with two slaves at 0 and 1. The SPI bus |
| itself is numbered 2. So we might access the SPI flash with: |
| |
| sf probe 2:0 |
| |
| and the eeprom with |
| |
| sspi 2:1 32 ef |
| |
| These commands simply need to look up the 2nd device in the SPI uclass to |
| find the right SPI bus. Then, they look at the children of that bus for the |
| right sequence number (0 or 1 in this case). |
| |
| Typically the alias method is used for top-level nodes and the 'reg' method |
| is used only for buses. |
| |
| Device sequence numbers are resolved when a device is probed. Before then |
| the sequence number is only a request which may or may not be honoured, |
| depending on what other devices have been probed. However the numbering is |
| entirely under the control of the board author so a conflict is generally |
| an error. |
| |
| |
| Bus Drivers |
| ----------- |
| |
| A common use of driver model is to implement a bus, a device which provides |
| access to other devices. Example of buses include SPI and I2C. Typically |
| the bus provides some sort of transport or translation that makes it |
| possible to talk to the devices on the bus. |
| |
| Driver model provides a few useful features to help with implementing |
| buses. Firstly, a bus can request that its children store some 'parent |
| data' which can be used to keep track of child state. Secondly, the bus can |
| define methods which are called when a child is probed or removed. This is |
| similar to the methods the uclass driver provides. |
| |
| Here an explanation of how a bus fits with a uclass may be useful. Consider |
| a USB bus with several devices attached to it, each from a different (made |
| up) uclass: |
| |
| xhci_usb (UCLASS_USB) |
| eth (UCLASS_ETHERNET) |
| camera (UCLASS_CAMERA) |
| flash (UCLASS_FLASH_STORAGE) |
| |
| Each of the devices is connected to a different address on the USB bus. |
| The bus device wants to store this address and some other information such |
| as the bus speed for each device. |
| |
| To achieve this, the bus device can use dev->parent_priv in each of its |
| three children. This can be auto-allocated if the bus driver has a non-zero |
| value for per_child_auto_alloc_size. If not, then the bus device can |
| allocate the space itself before the child device is probed. |
| |
| Also the bus driver can define the child_pre_probe() and child_post_remove() |
| methods to allow it to do some processing before the child is activated or |
| after it is deactivated. |
| |
| Note that the information that controls this behaviour is in the bus's |
| driver, not the child's. In fact it is possible that child has no knowledge |
| that it is connected to a bus. The same child device may even be used on two |
| different bus types. As an example. the 'flash' device shown above may also |
| be connected on a SATA bus or standalone with no bus: |
| |
| xhci_usb (UCLASS_USB) |
| flash (UCLASS_FLASH_STORAGE) - parent data/methods defined by USB bus |
| |
| sata (UCLASS_SATA) |
| flash (UCLASS_FLASH_STORAGE) - parent data/methods defined by SATA bus |
| |
| flash (UCLASS_FLASH_STORAGE) - no parent data/methods (not on a bus) |
| |
| Above you can see that the driver for xhci_usb/sata controls the child's |
| bus methods. In the third example the device is not on a bus, and therefore |
| will not have these methods at all. Consider the case where the flash |
| device defines child methods. These would be used for *its* children, and |
| would be quite separate from the methods defined by the driver for the bus |
| that the flash device is connetced to. The act of attaching a device to a |
| parent device which is a bus, causes the device to start behaving like a |
| bus device, regardless of its own views on the matter. |
| |
| The uclass for the device can also contain data private to that uclass. |
| But note that each device on the bus may be a memeber of a different |
| uclass, and this data has nothing to do with the child data for each child |
| on the bus. |
| |
| |
| Driver Lifecycle |
| ---------------- |
| |
| Here are the stages that a device goes through in driver model. Note that all |
| methods mentioned here are optional - e.g. if there is no probe() method for |
| a device then it will not be called. A simple device may have very few |
| methods actually defined. |
| |
| 1. Bind stage |
| |
| A device and its driver are bound using one of these two methods: |
| |
| - Scan the U_BOOT_DEVICE() definitions. U-Boot It looks up the |
| name specified by each, to find the appropriate driver. It then calls |
| device_bind() to create a new device and bind' it to its driver. This will |
| call the device's bind() method. |
| |
| - Scan through the device tree definitions. U-Boot looks at top-level |
| nodes in the the device tree. It looks at the compatible string in each node |
| and uses the of_match part of the U_BOOT_DRIVER() structure to find the |
| right driver for each node. It then calls device_bind() to bind the |
| newly-created device to its driver (thereby creating a device structure). |
| This will also call the device's bind() method. |
| |
| At this point all the devices are known, and bound to their drivers. There |
| is a 'struct udevice' allocated for all devices. However, nothing has been |
| activated (except for the root device). Each bound device that was created |
| from a U_BOOT_DEVICE() declaration will hold the platdata pointer specified |
| in that declaration. For a bound device created from the device tree, |
| platdata will be NULL, but of_offset will be the offset of the device tree |
| node that caused the device to be created. The uclass is set correctly for |
| the device. |
| |
| The device's bind() method is permitted to perform simple actions, but |
| should not scan the device tree node, not initialise hardware, nor set up |
| structures or allocate memory. All of these tasks should be left for |
| the probe() method. |
| |
| Note that compared to Linux, U-Boot's driver model has a separate step of |
| probe/remove which is independent of bind/unbind. This is partly because in |
| U-Boot it may be expensive to probe devices and we don't want to do it until |
| they are needed, or perhaps until after relocation. |
| |
| 2. Activation/probe |
| |
| When a device needs to be used, U-Boot activates it, by following these |
| steps (see device_probe()): |
| |
| a. If priv_auto_alloc_size is non-zero, then the device-private space |
| is allocated for the device and zeroed. It will be accessible as |
| dev->priv. The driver can put anything it likes in there, but should use |
| it for run-time information, not platform data (which should be static |
| and known before the device is probed). |
| |
| b. If platdata_auto_alloc_size is non-zero, then the platform data space |
| is allocated. This is only useful for device tree operation, since |
| otherwise you would have to specific the platform data in the |
| U_BOOT_DEVICE() declaration. The space is allocated for the device and |
| zeroed. It will be accessible as dev->platdata. |
| |
| c. If the device's uclass specifies a non-zero per_device_auto_alloc_size, |
| then this space is allocated and zeroed also. It is allocated for and |
| stored in the device, but it is uclass data. owned by the uclass driver. |
| It is possible for the device to access it. |
| |
| d. If the device's immediate parent specifies a per_child_auto_alloc_size |
| then this space is allocated. This is intended for use by the parent |
| device to keep track of things related to the child. For example a USB |
| flash stick attached to a USB host controller would likely use this |
| space. The controller can hold information about the USB state of each |
| of its children. |
| |
| e. All parent devices are probed. It is not possible to activate a device |
| unless its predecessors (all the way up to the root device) are activated. |
| This means (for example) that an I2C driver will require that its bus |
| be activated. |
| |
| f. The device's sequence number is assigned, either the requested one |
| (assuming no conflicts) or the next available one if there is a conflict |
| or nothing particular is requested. |
| |
| g. If the driver provides an ofdata_to_platdata() method, then this is |
| called to convert the device tree data into platform data. This should |
| do various calls like fdtdec_get_int(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, ...) |
| to access the node and store the resulting information into dev->platdata. |
| After this point, the device works the same way whether it was bound |
| using a device tree node or U_BOOT_DEVICE() structure. In either case, |
| the platform data is now stored in the platdata structure. Typically you |
| will use the platdata_auto_alloc_size feature to specify the size of the |
| platform data structure, and U-Boot will automatically allocate and zero |
| it for you before entry to ofdata_to_platdata(). But if not, you can |
| allocate it yourself in ofdata_to_platdata(). Note that it is preferable |
| to do all the device tree decoding in ofdata_to_platdata() rather than |
| in probe(). (Apart from the ugliness of mixing configuration and run-time |
| data, one day it is possible that U-Boot will cache platformat data for |
| devices which are regularly de/activated). |
| |
| h. The device's probe() method is called. This should do anything that |
| is required by the device to get it going. This could include checking |
| that the hardware is actually present, setting up clocks for the |
| hardware and setting up hardware registers to initial values. The code |
| in probe() can access: |
| |
| - platform data in dev->platdata (for configuration) |
| - private data in dev->priv (for run-time state) |
| - uclass data in dev->uclass_priv (for things the uclass stores |
| about this device) |
| |
| Note: If you don't use priv_auto_alloc_size then you will need to |
| allocate the priv space here yourself. The same applies also to |
| platdata_auto_alloc_size. Remember to free them in the remove() method. |
| |
| i. The device is marked 'activated' |
| |
| j. The uclass's post_probe() method is called, if one exists. This may |
| cause the uclass to do some housekeeping to record the device as |
| activated and 'known' by the uclass. |
| |
| 3. Running stage |
| |
| The device is now activated and can be used. From now until it is removed |
| all of the above structures are accessible. The device appears in the |
| uclass's list of devices (so if the device is in UCLASS_GPIO it will appear |
| as a device in the GPIO uclass). This is the 'running' state of the device. |
| |
| 4. Removal stage |
| |
| When the device is no-longer required, you can call device_remove() to |
| remove it. This performs the probe steps in reverse: |
| |
| a. The uclass's pre_remove() method is called, if one exists. This may |
| cause the uclass to do some housekeeping to record the device as |
| deactivated and no-longer 'known' by the uclass. |
| |
| b. All the device's children are removed. It is not permitted to have |
| an active child device with a non-active parent. This means that |
| device_remove() is called for all the children recursively at this point. |
| |
| c. The device's remove() method is called. At this stage nothing has been |
| deallocated so platform data, private data and the uclass data will all |
| still be present. This is where the hardware can be shut down. It is |
| intended that the device be completely inactive at this point, For U-Boot |
| to be sure that no hardware is running, it should be enough to remove |
| all devices. |
| |
| d. The device memory is freed (platform data, private data, uclass data, |
| parent data). |
| |
| Note: Because the platform data for a U_BOOT_DEVICE() is defined with a |
| static pointer, it is not de-allocated during the remove() method. For |
| a device instantiated using the device tree data, the platform data will |
| be dynamically allocated, and thus needs to be deallocated during the |
| remove() method, either: |
| |
| 1. if the platdata_auto_alloc_size is non-zero, the deallocation |
| happens automatically within the driver model core; or |
| |
| 2. when platdata_auto_alloc_size is 0, both the allocation (in probe() |
| or preferably ofdata_to_platdata()) and the deallocation in remove() |
| are the responsibility of the driver author. |
| |
| e. The device sequence number is set to -1, meaning that it no longer |
| has an allocated sequence. If the device is later reactivated and that |
| sequence number is still free, it may well receive the name sequence |
| number again. But from this point, the sequence number previously used |
| by this device will no longer exist (think of SPI bus 2 being removed |
| and bus 2 is no longer available for use). |
| |
| f. The device is marked inactive. Note that it is still bound, so the |
| device structure itself is not freed at this point. Should the device be |
| activated again, then the cycle starts again at step 2 above. |
| |
| 5. Unbind stage |
| |
| The device is unbound. This is the step that actually destroys the device. |
| If a parent has children these will be destroyed first. After this point |
| the device does not exist and its memory has be deallocated. |
| |
| |
| Data Structures |
| --------------- |
| |
| Driver model uses a doubly-linked list as the basic data structure. Some |
| nodes have several lists running through them. Creating a more efficient |
| data structure might be worthwhile in some rare cases, once we understand |
| what the bottlenecks are. |
| |
| |
| Changes since v1 |
| ---------------- |
| |
| For the record, this implementation uses a very similar approach to the |
| original patches, but makes at least the following changes: |
| |
| - Tried to aggressively remove boilerplate, so that for most drivers there |
| is little or no 'driver model' code to write. |
| - Moved some data from code into data structure - e.g. store a pointer to |
| the driver operations structure in the driver, rather than passing it |
| to the driver bind function. |
| - Rename some structures to make them more similar to Linux (struct udevice |
| instead of struct instance, struct platdata, etc.) |
| - Change the name 'core' to 'uclass', meaning U-Boot class. It seems that |
| this concept relates to a class of drivers (or a subsystem). We shouldn't |
| use 'class' since it is a C++ reserved word, so U-Boot class (uclass) seems |
| better than 'core'. |
| - Remove 'struct driver_instance' and just use a single 'struct udevice'. |
| This removes a level of indirection that doesn't seem necessary. |
| - Built in device tree support, to avoid the need for platdata |
| - Removed the concept of driver relocation, and just make it possible for |
| the new driver (created after relocation) to access the old driver data. |
| I feel that relocation is a very special case and will only apply to a few |
| drivers, many of which can/will just re-init anyway. So the overhead of |
| dealing with this might not be worth it. |
| - Implemented a GPIO system, trying to keep it simple |
| |
| |
| Pre-Relocation Support |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| For pre-relocation we simply call the driver model init function. Only |
| drivers marked with DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC or the device tree |
| 'u-boot,dm-pre-reloc' flag are initialised prior to relocation. This helps |
| to reduce the driver model overhead. |
| |
| Then post relocation we throw that away and re-init driver model again. |
| For drivers which require some sort of continuity between pre- and |
| post-relocation devices, we can provide access to the pre-relocation |
| device pointers, but this is not currently implemented (the root device |
| pointer is saved but not made available through the driver model API). |
| |
| |
| Things to punt for later |
| ------------------------ |
| |
| - SPL support - this will have to be present before many drivers can be |
| converted, but it seems like we can add it once we are happy with the |
| core implementation. |
| |
| That is not to say that no thinking has gone into this - in fact there |
| is quite a lot there. However, getting these right is non-trivial and |
| there is a high cost associated with going down the wrong path. |
| |
| For SPL, it may be possible to fit in a simplified driver model with only |
| bind and probe methods, to reduce size. |
| |
| Uclasses are statically numbered at compile time. It would be possible to |
| change this to dynamic numbering, but then we would require some sort of |
| lookup service, perhaps searching by name. This is slightly less efficient |
| so has been left out for now. One small advantage of dynamic numbering might |
| be fewer merge conflicts in uclass-id.h. |
| |
| |
| Simon Glass |
| sjg@chromium.org |
| April 2013 |
| Updated 7-May-13 |
| Updated 14-Jun-13 |
| Updated 18-Oct-13 |
| Updated 5-Nov-13 |