spl/85xx: new SPL support
Update CONFIG_RAMBOOT and CONFIG_NAND_SPL references to accept CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, respectively. CONFIG_NAND_SPL can be removed once
the last mpc85xx nand_spl target is gone.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT will need to remain for other use cases, but it doesn't
seem right to overload it for meaning SPL as well as nand_spl does. Even
if it's somewhat appropriate for the main u-boot, the SPL itself isn't
(necessarily) ramboot, and we don't have separate configs for SPL and
main u-boot. It was also inconsistent, as other platforms such as
mpc83xx didn't use CONFIG_RAMBOOT in this way.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/law.c b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/law.c
index 223cd5d..ce1d71e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/law.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/law.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
return;
}
-#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
+#if !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
static int get_law_entry(u8 i, struct law_entry *e)
{
u32 lawar;
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
return idx;
}
-#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
+#if !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
int set_last_law(phys_addr_t addr, enum law_size sz, enum law_trgt_if id)
{
u32 idx;
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@
return 0;
}
-#endif
+#endif /* not SPL */
void init_laws(void)
{
@@ -258,9 +258,10 @@
gd->used_laws |= (1 << i);
}
-#if defined(CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT) && !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)
+#if (defined(CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT) && !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL)) || \
+ (defined(CONFIG_SPL) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD))
/*
- * in NAND boot we've already parsed the law_table and setup those LAWs
+ * in SPL boot we've already parsed the law_table and setup those LAWs
* so don't do it again.
*/
return;