| Pre-relocation device tree manipulation |
| ======================================= |
| |
| Contents: |
| |
| 1. Purpose |
| 2. Implementation |
| 3. Example |
| 4. Work to be done |
| |
| 1. Purpose |
| ---------- |
| |
| In certain markets, it is beneficial for manufacturers of embedded devices to |
| offer certain ranges of products, where the functionality of the devices within |
| one series either don't differ greatly from another, or can be thought of as |
| "extensions" of each other, where one device only differs from another in the |
| addition of a small number of features (e.g. an additional output connector). |
| |
| To realize this in hardware, one method is to have a motherboard, and several |
| possible daughter boards that can be attached to this mother board. Different |
| daughter boards then either offer the slightly different functionality, or the |
| addition of the daughter board to the device realizes the "extension" of |
| functionality to the device described previously. |
| |
| For the software, we obviously want to reuse components for all these |
| variations of the device. This means that the software somehow needs to cope |
| with the situation that certain ICs may or may not be present on any given |
| system, depending on which daughter boards are connected to the motherboard. |
| |
| In the Linux kernel, one possible solution to this problem is to employ the |
| device tree overlay mechanism: There exists one "base" device tree, which |
| features only the components guaranteed to exist in all varieties of the |
| device. At the start of the kernel, the presence and type of the daughter |
| boards is then detected, and the corresponding device tree overlays are applied |
| to support the components on the daughter boards. |
| |
| Note that the components present on every variety of the board must, of course, |
| provide a way to find out if and which daughter boards are installed for this |
| mechanism to work. |
| |
| In the U-Boot boot loader, support for device tree overlays has recently been |
| integrated, and is used on some boards to alter the device tree that is later |
| passed to Linux. But since U-Boot's driver model, which is device tree-based as |
| well, is being used in more and more drivers, the same problem of altering the |
| device tree starts cropping up in U-Boot itself as well. |
| |
| An additional problem with the device tree in U-Boot is that it is read-only, |
| and the current mechanisms don't allow easy manipulation of the device tree |
| after the driver model has been initialized. While migrating to a live device |
| tree (at least after the relocation) would greatly simplify the solution of |
| this problem, it is a non-negligible task to implement it, an a interim |
| solution is needed to address the problem at least in the medium-term. |
| |
| Hence, we propose a solution to this problem by offering a board-specific |
| call-back function, which is passed a writeable pointer to the device tree. |
| This function is called before the device tree is relocated, and specifically |
| before the main U-Boot's driver model is instantiated, hence the main U-Boot |
| "sees" all modifications to the device tree made in this function. Furthermore, |
| we have the pre-relocation driver model at our disposal at this stage, which |
| means that we can query the hardware for the existence and variety of the |
| components easily. |
| |
| 2. Implementation |
| ----------------- |
| |
| To take advantage of the pre-relocation device tree manipulation mechanism, |
| boards have to implement the function board_fix_fdt, which has the following |
| signature: |
| |
| int board_fix_fdt (void *rw_fdt_blob) |
| |
| The passed-in void pointer is a writeable pointer to the device tree, which can |
| be used to manipulate the device tree using e.g. functions from |
| include/fdt_support.h. The return value should either be 0 in case of |
| successful execution of the device tree manipulation or something else for a |
| failure. Note that returning a non-null value from the function will |
| unrecoverably halt the boot process, as with any function from init_sequence_f |
| (in common/board_f.c). |
| |
| Furthermore, the Kconfig option OF_BOARD_FIXUP has to be set for the function |
| to be called: |
| |
| Device Tree Control |
| -> [*] Board-specific manipulation of Device Tree |
| |
| +----------------------------------------------------------+ |
| | WARNING: The actual manipulation of the device tree has | |
| | to be the _last_ set of operations in board_fix_fdt! | |
| | Since the pre-relocation driver model does not adapt to | |
| | changes made to the device tree either, its references | |
| | into the device tree will be invalid after manipulating | |
| | it, and unpredictable behavior might occur when | |
| | functions that rely on them are executed! | |
| +----------------------------------------------------------+ |
| |
| Hence, the recommended layout of the board_fixup_fdt call-back function is the |
| following: |
| |
| int board_fix_fdt(void *rw_fdt_blob) |
| { |
| /* Collect information about device's hardware and store them in e.g. |
| local variables */ |
| |
| /* Do device tree manipulation using the values previously collected */ |
| |
| /* Return 0 on successful manipulation and non-zero otherwise */ |
| } |
| |
| If this convention is kept, both an "additive" approach, meaning that nodes for |
| detected components are added to the device tree, as well as a "subtractive" |
| approach, meaning that nodes for absent components are removed from the tree, |
| as well as a combination of both approaches should work. |
| |
| 3. Example |
| ---------- |
| |
| The controlcenterdc board (board/gdsys/a38x/controlcenterdc.c) features a |
| board_fix_fdt function, in which six GPIO expanders (which might be present or |
| not, since they are on daughter boards) on a I2C bus are queried for, and |
| subsequently deactivated in the device tree if they are not present. |
| |
| Note that the dm_i2c_simple_probe function does not use the device tree, hence |
| it is safe to call it after the tree has already been manipulated. |
| |
| 4. Work to be done |
| ------------------ |
| |
| * The application of device tree overlay should be possible in board_fixup_fdt, |
| but has not been tested at this stage. |
| |
| 2017-01-06, Mario Six <mario.six@gdsys.cc> |